Read this article in the Manataka Native American News – Smoke Signals on line paper and wanted to share it.
Native Children Were “Wild Indians”
by Doug George-Kanentiio
“The accusations that Minnesota Vikings football player Adrian Peterson, a 29 year old 1.85 m tall , 100 kg running back, applied corporal punishment to his four year old son sufficient in severity to cause bleeding and bruising is cause for of all us to examine how children are disciplined and whether any adult has the authority to assault an adolescent, particularly one who is still an infant.
Among aboriginal peoples children were raised as “wild Indians” free to roam about almost without restraint.
As the European colonists observed Native children were given enormous liberty to play without qualification. They had no reason to fear the natural world or the adults around them since physical punishment was something unknown in their lives. In Dr. Barbara Mann’s book ” Iroquoian Women: The Gantowisas” (Peter Lang Publishing, NY 2004) she noted that:
“The fondness of Iroquoian adults for children is legendary…because of their gentleness with children corporal punishment was unthinkable to the Iroquois… the Iroquois used no whips, no punishments, no threats such as Europeans habitually plied against their own children.”
The Iroquois believed that all children were gifts from the Creator regardless of the circumstances of their birth. The colonists observed that such was the affection the Iroquois had for children that an unwed mother in a Christian community, who might otherwise be ostracized, was given shelter among the Natives and her child raised as one of their own once the mother returned to her home.
At Akwesasne it was not unusual for newborns to be brought across the St. Lawrence River from nearby Cornwall and left in the care of a Mohawk family without any stigma.
In the many “captive” narratives describing how the Iroquois treated non-Native children it was observed that they were quickly adopted into clans and families, treated with love and compassion to such an extant that when they had a chance to return to their former communities they refused to do so.
In Iroquois cosmology there are many stories which instruct the people as to how to raise children without force, fear or coercion. There are two in particular that are universal in their telling. One is called the “Seven Dancers” and refers to a group of children who had been physically struck by their parents and elected to return to the Sky World despite the pleas of the adults for them to return. One of them did elect to return to the earth and became a shooting star, hence the eternal reminder to all people not to bring harm to any child.
The second is the legend of the Thunder Beings in which one of the Skydwellers mates with a human being and gives birth to boy. When the grandmother of the son strikes the toddler a great explosion takes place across the horizon and the infant
These stories emphasize the need to treat all children with respect. The application of physical beatings destroys the child’s sense of well being and security; it teaches that child that violence is an integral part of their lives. A child who is struck learns to obey not out of respect but out of fear.
When the colonists saw the freedom enjoyed by Iroquois children they were shocked, referring to this kind of behavior as “savage” and “wild”. They did not see that the liberty and pure freedom enjoyed by the Iroquois as a society was rooted in their seeming unrestrained actions as kids.
But what would happen to an adult who struck a child? That person would be brought before a council of women. Their actions would be examined and if they were found in breach of the community standards for child raising they could be ostracized or expelled from the home. Every member of the child’s immediate and extended family (the clan) would have the responsibility of meeting the child’s needs, effecting healing and insuring their continued safety.
The Iroquois did have two ways of bringing bad behavior to an end: one was to blow a mouth full of water on the child and the next was to exclude them from any and all family activities until they showed remorse. Neither involved the physical harm capable of being brought to bear by a professional athlete.”
Those were different, and often difficult times for THE PEOPLE. Would this type of child rearing work for us now?
I don’t beleive it would for a number of reasons, the primary one being “family”. The “family” in the sense of the Ancient Ones is alien to what we now know.
1. Do you know your neighbor well enough to trust him with your child?
2. If a hungry child walked into your house, sat at your table and asked for food, would, or even better could you feed him?
3. Will you be your neighbor’s shield when he is unfairly accused?
4. Will you take food to a hungry family simply because they need it?
5. Will you fight for those who cannot?
These, and more as practices still believed in within most, if not all American Indian communities. If that makes THE PEOPLE different, then I am in awe and bow low to their expertise.
I do not see any of these virtues practiced by anyone in our government or hoping to be our president.